The W Down Sign

When driving behind a massive SUV with a Bush/Cheney sticker still present a year and half after the election, I simply cannot help using the thumb and index finger of each hand in tandem to make a W easily visible to the rear view mirror glance of the Bush supporter in front of me. Then having made the W sign, I allow my hands to fall into a thumbs down position. I am saying "W is going down." I do this over and over never really knowing whether the Bushie SUV driver in front of me even sees the gesture let alone understands it. Actually, the ones who suddenly change lanes or attempt to speed away from me do realize that I am gesticulating. They may think I am some sort of terrorist

Yes my act is pathetic. I live in a red state; pathos is my lot. I am surrounded by these people and altogether too aware of their crying need for unanimity. I just want them to know that I am following Apple computer's advice to "Think Different." I know that my little W-down sign will accomplish nothing. But it makes me feel better. And truth to tell a huge number of W stickers have vanished from my morning drive!

Bomb Bomb Bomb, Bomb Bomb Iran?

Whenever I read a Sy Hersh piece I think the stuff he says cannot be true. "No they wouldn't do that, it's too nuts!" I often initially think to myself. But as time rolls on I--we all--discover that yes it may be too nuts, but the W Administration will do it. It was Mr Hersh's reporting that first informed us that Abu Ghraib was not an isolated incident but part of a systematic program of torture to soften detainees up for Military Intelligence interrogations. He reported that the authority for the program went right up to the Pentagon E Ring offices. At first that story seemed preposterous, we were Americans, aka THE GOOD GUYS, and good guys don't torture people. But then came the Gonzalez memos providing the President with a legal justification for torture; and suddenly we knew we were through the looking glass.

Now Mr. Hersh writes in the New Yorker that bombing Iran to take out the nuclear weapon making infrastructure is under serious consideration at the White House. Some options even call for the use of tactical nuclear weapons to get at hardened underground labs, (that would be a precious irony; using nukes to prevent the spread of nukes). Again, my first reaction is "Why that's just nuts! We are not winning in Iraq as it is, the last thing we need now is a war with Iran!"

I keep forgetting. I am a member of the "reality based community." For me things have to make sense and add up. Bombing Iran does not make sense nor add up.

But then again I am just not amoral and ruthless enough to see that bombing Iran does make sense. With poll numbers as rotten as Bush's and with the prospect of one or both houses of Congress going to the Democrats in November now would be the time for some of that "Commander in Chief" razzle dazzle. If he lays some of that famous "Shock and Awe" on Iran it could change the political dynamics here at home. Rove is probably focus grouping it right now.

The Leaky Bush Administration

So Mr Bush who hates leakers turns out to be THE LEAKER in the Scooter Libby affair. Mr Bush is apparently not culpable for breaking the law since he declassified this intelligence info on the fly when giving it to the VP for Scooter to give to NYT reporter Judith Miller. But what about the President's pledge to fire any leakers he found. Is he going to fire himself? I sure wish he would.

The second thing to consider is that Bush, Cheney and Libby were aware or should have been aware that the intelligence they were using had largely been discredited. Still if the overriding concern was to butress a justification for the Iraq war it would have served their purposes well to put this information into the hands of gullible NY Times reporter Judy Miller.

Finally, can the President legally blow the cover of a CIA operative? While I have no problem with the President being able to declassify intelligence information on the fly ( especially in an emergency), I do have a problem with him blowing the cover of a CIA operative as happened in the Plame case. If the information about Ms. Plame went from President Bush to Vice President Cheney to his then Chief of Staff I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby and on to Ms. Miller of the Times then the President appears to be in violation of Federal law.

OK So I am Blogging now right? Hello?!

I feel embarassed for people who do not realize there is a 7 secord delay on most call in shows. They have waited a long time to get on the air. They have a very hot opinion they want to express. Someone tells them they are on the air. It is the host but he/she dosen't really sound like the host through the phone...and anyway the caller can still hear the host talking on the radio. In that instant the caller often falls victim to confusion and then does not recover. The host prods for the hot opinion as the caller just begins to realize that it is gone. Things go down hill from there.

I wanted my frist official blog post to be different from a muffed radio call in but mainly I wanted it to be different from routine first posts of new bloggers and I think I have accomplished that objective. I certainly have not delivered a hot a opinion as yet. I have several. But now just does not seem like the time. Then again I need to give you a reason to read these posts don't I.

Well here is one. Karl Rove told a group of Republicans a while back that if Al Qaeda is calling someone in America, the White House/NSA wants to know about it. Now it occurs to me that of 275 million Americans most of us (oh around 99.9%) do not know a bin Laden. But George W. Bush surely knows the bin Laden lad who invested a substantial sum of money in his oil company. And then his dad former President George H W Bush sat on the Carlyle Group board with another bin Laden. I'm not saying they held hands or anything but that Mr. Bush probably knew that Mr. bin Laden. So a big confusion could arise here. Al Qaeda may start calling and end up somehow talking to George W or George H W and then what would Karl Rove and NSA do....?